Quote of the Day
“We are safer, stronger and more human when we stand together.”
— António Guterres, UN Secretary-General
The words are especially fitting as the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly continues its High-Level Week in New York. The gathering runs through September 28 and is centred on renewed international cooperation, sustainable development, peace, dignity and equality.
But the test of multilateralism is not the number of speeches delivered in New York. It is whether international commitments alter what happens to people far from the conference halls.
Today, three issues illustrate that challenge particularly clearly: protecting civilians in Sudan, confronting violence against women in Cameroon, and defending freedom of expression in an increasingly digital world.
Sudan: warfare is changing faster than civilian protection
A high-level event at the UN this week drew attention to the expanding use of drones in Sudan’s war. The Coalition for Atrocity Prevention and Justice in Sudan—including Canada and several European governments—warned that drones are extending hostilities geographically and increasing risks to civilians, humanitarian workers and other front-line responders.
This raises an important human-rights question.
Technology can change the means of warfare. It cannot change the obligations of those conducting it.
Protecting civilians, hospitals, humanitarian personnel and other non-combatants remains fundamental. And when increasingly remote technologies make violence easier to project across enormous distances, mechanisms for documenting attacks and establishing accountability become even more important.
Cameroon: promises to protect women must become protection
Cameroon continues to face serious concerns over violence against women and girls.
Human Rights Watch reported in August that gender-based violence remains widespread and linked the problem to entrenched inequality, discriminatory laws, weak institutions and inadequate investment in prevention and survivor services. It noted that Cameroon adopted a national strategy against gender-based violence and a national gender policy in 2022, while officials have also discussed stronger legislation.
The distinction between commitment and implementation matters.
A strategy does not protect a woman seeking refuge tonight. A policy does not prosecute an abuser. A declaration does not automatically provide a shelter, lawyer, social worker or functioning reporting mechanism.
Advocacy therefore cannot stop when governments announce policies. Some of its most important work begins afterward: tracking whether promises become institutions, budgets, services and measurable protection.
Canada: digital repression is becoming a human-rights issue
On September 23, Canada announced additional sanctions against five Iranian individuals and five state-directed entities that it says are involved in serious and systematic human-rights violations.
Significantly, the Canadian government specifically identified digital surveillance and censorship among the tools used to suppress dissent, alongside arbitrary detention, intimidation and unlawful violence.
That makes this more than a sanctions story.
It is a communication-rights story.
Freedom of expression increasingly depends not simply on whether people are legally permitted to speak, but whether governments can monitor them, censor the platforms they use, identify dissenters digitally or prevent information from circulating.
The infrastructure of communication is therefore becoming part of the infrastructure of human rights.
What comes next at the UN
On September 28, the General Assembly is scheduled to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, adopted following the 2001 World Conference Against Racism in South Africa.
The UN describes the declaration as a global blueprint for combating racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance. This year’s meeting carries the theme “Mobilizing global public support for the full and effective implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action.”
The phrase public support is worth noticing.
Human-rights instruments do not live only in treaties, conference rooms and government ministries. Their effectiveness also depends on whether ordinary people understand them, whether journalists explain them, whether educators teach them, whether advocates translate them into accessible language—and whether affected communities can participate in the conversation.
That is where communication becomes advocacy.
Did You Know?
Today, September 26, Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand is scheduled to deliver Canada’s national statement to the UN General Assembly, setting out the country’s foreign-policy priorities and approach to major geopolitical issues.
And on September 28–29, Canada, Ukraine and Norway are due to host an international conference in Toronto focused on returning Ukrainian children, detained civilians and prisoners of war, as well as rehabilitation and reintegration for those who return.
These meetings will generate declarations and commitments.
The harder question comes afterward:
Who follows up?
For discussion
When governments make human-rights commitments before the international community, who should be responsible for tracking whether those promises are actually implemented—governments themselves, journalists, civil society, international institutions, or citizens?
Published by Killian Tubuo Nkwain
Leave a comment